A video of School Resource Officer (SRO) in South Carolina flipping, tossing and manhandling a 16-year-old female high school student has gone viral, again raising concern and questions about the presence of police in schools, the criminalization of certain behavior by juveniles, and racial disparities in cases of excessive use of force by law enforcement.
While the Spring Valley High School student may have broken school rules and, as reported, struck the officer, there is a question as to why this should have been a police matter in the first place.
The original behavior that prompted school administrators to call the resource officer for assistance concerned the student’s refusal to leave the classroom by a teacher and the principal and for exhibiting what appeared to be oppositional defiant and conduct disorders.
Prior to the introduction of resources officers in schools, the school administrator would have handled such a situation unless the student was physically violent and posed a threat of physical harm to themselves, other students or staff. But in this case, the school resource officer was called in to take charge.
School Districts began hiring police in the 1990s
The SRO program has been in place since the early 1990s when thousands of districts, often with subsidies from grants from the Department of Justice Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS), paid local police agencies to provide armed SROs for high schools, middle schools and in some cases, elementary schools.
There are nearly 31,000 SROs or similar law enforcement officers stationed at public schools across the country, according to news reports. There are another 13,060 sworn law enforcement officers who are present at least part of their time at schools . According to COPS, the role of SROs includes law enforcement, informal counseling, education and emergency managers.
There is a growing consensus that many SRO programs have strayed from their original purpose and have focused almost entirely on the law enforcement role. The Spring Valley High School incident reinforces how troublesome the presence of SROs in schools can be.
Compounding the problem is that the vast majority of the thousands of students are arrested or given criminal citations at schools each year are African American and Latino children. Those with cognitive disabilities are also disproportionately represented.
Many of these cases will be actually adjudicated in juvenile courts, leaving the students with a criminal charge or conviction for relatively minor offenses. For instance, the teenager in the South Carolina incident will be charged under the state’s disturbing schools law, a misdemeanor that allows police to arrest a student for disrupting class or school functions.
Though she was released to her parents, the county will continue to pursue prosecution under the disturbing schools law, according to news reports. The two following quotes from Justice Quarterly effectively make that point:
“…the most striking impact of school police officers so far, critics say, has been a surge in arrests or misdemeanor charges for essentially nonviolent behavior — including scuffles, truancy and cursing at teachers — that sends children into the criminal courts.”
“There is no evidence that placing officers in the schools improves safety, and it increases the number of minor behavior problems that are referred to the police, pushing kids into the criminal system.”
By all accounts, the teenager who was handled so violently by the SRO defied teachers and school administrators by being disruptive (for not putting her cell phone away) and not leaving the classroom as instructed. However, there is nothing to indicate that she posed a physical threat to fellow students, teachers or administrators.
School Social Workers are a Solution
Why did this behavior rise to the level of intervention from a law enforcement officer? Were there no other options such as having the school counselor or school social worker attempt an intervention to de-escalate the situation? Part of the answer to those questions is that it is very likely that Spring Valley High School may not have a full-time school social worker or counselor on staff.
Criminalizing student misconduct is made more insidious when we realize that at the same time school districts are reducing the number of professionals trained to handle such cased where a student exhibits behaviors that are unacceptable in school, but do not reach the level of physical danger to other students or staff.
For example, a report on budget impact on school social workers states that in California’s 2010 academic year, there was only one school social worker for every 15,000 public school students. The report went on to emphasize that social workers often assist students in dealing with stress, emotional problems, work directly with children with disabilities and their families, and address problems such as misbehavior, truancy, teenage pregnancy, and drug and alcohol problems.
With that in mind, it would appear to be without question that a school counselor or school social worker would have been a better choice to resolve the Spring Valley dispute than an SRO.
The National Association of Social Workers applauds the Department of Justice for opening a full investigation of the incident. NASW believes the dismissal of the SRO who was so grossly over-aggressive in his treatment of the teenage student.
And NASW agrees with NAACP President and CEO Cornell William Brooks when he said, “This [incident] is also a clear indication that the shifts in resource and spending by school districts have created an over-reliance on armed police instead of educated and trained school administrators. It is unfortunate that our school principals and vice principals, the traditional administrators of school discipline, have been put in a position to rely on street policing inside our school classrooms rather than administering tried and true education discipline tactics and policies.”
Additional NASW Resources:
Graduation or Incarceration? How School Discipline Policies Shape the Path for Vulnerable Students
Call the Principal, Not the Police: Preventing the School to Prison Pipeline
The School Social Worker in Crisis Situations: The Right Skills, The Right Professional
For more information on the National Association of Social Workers’ positions on juvenile justice issues contact NASW Social Justice and Human Rights Manager Mel Wilson at email@example.com. For information about school social work contact NASW Senior Practice Associate Sharon Dietsche at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Thirty years ago, while in Jr. high school, I became involved in a physical fight with another girl my age, 16. The school’s V.P grabbed and hauled both of us up and apart using the “baby hairs” on the back of our heads. We walked all the way to his office, on our tippy toes, then were handed over to the guidance counselor and principal to work out the issues, we thought at the time, important. No cops involved.
Robin and I are still very close friends. Baby hairs before cops.
Unfortunately, School Social Workers are often not utilized because there are no School Social Workers! The positions are few and far between and often 1 Social Worker is responsible for an elementary, middle, and high school. A Social Worker needs to be a school and accessible to students on a daily basis. Much of the work involves developing a relationship with students and teachers, esp those students taht come from probelmatic backgrounds.
Having Police Officers in a School is outrageous. Schools are not places for the Police. If a Situation escalelates than the Police can be called, but if they are there all of the time how does anyone learn in that environment.
Of course if the school was smaller and there were more resoruces (e.g Social Workers) than perhaps these kind of siuations would be different. But of course that would involve more funding… and in our current society it seems like many are not willing to pay for public good. Cutting funding and personnel never results in a better result.
Why did this Teacher and the Principal not manage the behavior. Is’nt that what School Personnel learn? Why did not they just pick up the desk and take the tudent outside? Why did they not contact the parents?
Hopefully someone is working on this in order to find some solutions.
I think that she shouldve been arrested and that the sro used excessive force. i think that we need both social workers and police in the schools.
School Social Workers when finances are difficult in school districts are the first to go – if they had them in thefirst place.
Another factor is that schools need funding, so going after a DOJ grant for an SRO looks like an attractive option as opposed to finding the money for a 100% locally funded position.
When the Principal, the Asst Principal, the Lesd Socialworker, the two school policemen and the large suspension room attendant left me alone in a new suspension room. When I was beat up by a student, they all ran for the tall grass and left me to face the school’s corporate attorneys for 11 years, I lost everything–job, health, home, & well-being. I live in poverty today with no hope. Be careful what you wish for.
This is an op-ed article. To call for one profession over another to deal with emotional/behavioral problems in the classroom, without citing any evidence in favor of one over the other, makes NASW appear less-than-competent in promotion of the profession. What studies have been published demonstrating efficacy of social work interventions in the classroom? Likewise, what studies are published demonstrating the success or failure of school resource officers?
What if we were to pilot a model that partners school social workers with school resource officers?
Good points made. Thank You. james
I agree with the main points of the article, wholeheartedly, but it needs editing.
This makes no sense:
The original behavior that prompted school administrators to call the resource officer for assistance concerned the student’s refusal to leave the classroom by a teacher and the principal and for exhibiting what appeared to be oppositional defiant and conduct disorders.”
-refusal to leave the classroom by a teacher and the principal for exhibiting what appeared to be oppositional defiant and conduct disorders?
I’m assuming you meant “refusal to leave *when directed to* by a teacher…” ?
Also “NASW believes the dismissal of the SRO who was so grossly over-aggressive in his treatment of the teenage student.”
NASW believes what? They believe the dismissal happened? Well, that’s good cuz I don’t think it was in doubt, but I’m fairly sure there’s something missing here like “…was justified”
Otherwise, great piece!
I called a dear friend regarding this issue. What breaks my heart is she agreeded and supported the SRO. I wondered why the teacher in this case forced the situation.Why couldn’t she wait until the class was over to deal with the issue. Why did the teacher escalate the problem. I sent my children to private schools to avoid pathological public schools.Yes we need social workers in public schools. What happened to prevention.