Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Google Plus
Share On Linkdin
Contact us

NASW Response to Orlando Massacre: Sensible gun laws, treat gun violence as a public health threat, and end culture of hate

Photos of some of the victims of the Orlando massacre. Photo courtesy of WSBTV.com.

Photos of some of the victims of the Orlando massacre. Photo courtesy of WSBTV.com.

The nation awoke on June 12 to the worst case of a single person committing mass murder with a gun in its history.

A gunman killed 49 people and injured more than 50 at Pulse, an Orlando nightclub that serves a predominately LGBTQ clientele. Most of the victims were also Latino.

Compounding such a horrific loss of life is the fact the man who committed the murders may have been  motivated by a complex mix of ISIL-inspired terrorism, anger toward American culture, bigotry, homophobia and internalized self-hatred because he may have had gay tendencies. He also had legal access to assault weapons with high capacity magazines. All of this formed a lethal combination.

However, as disturbing as the Orlando massacre was, it was only one of 91 gun-related mass murders in 2016 alone (mass murder is defined as four or more victims including the gunman). Moreover, within the last 10 years, there have been 371 deaths from mass gun shootings. Overwhelmingly, the shooters’ weapons of choice were high-powered, semi-automatic assault guns and rifles.

As seen in the massive loss of life and injuries at the Orlando nightclub, such weapons are meant to inflict death or devastating wounds. Without easy access to assault weapons, it is unlikely the carnage of Orlando, Sandy Hook or Virginia Tech would have left so many dead and maimed.

This tragedy should be seen as both terrorism and a hate crime, just as the mass murder of nine black members of the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in South Carolina was a hate crime. All of which adds another dimension to developing strategies for greatly reducing mass shootings in the United States.

There are concrete steps that public officials and the public at large can take to reduce the frequency of such disasters:

1. As a country, we must recognize that mass shootings are only a fraction of gun violence in the United States and we must look at gun violence in its totality. More than 35,000 people die each year from guns from a range of incidents including suicides, inner-city violence and accidents. Children between the ages of 5 and 14 in the United States are also 17 times more likely to be murdered by firearms than children in other industrialized nations.

2. Federal, state and local officials must approach gun violence, including mass shootings, as a public health emergency similar to how we are reacting to the opioid/heroin crisis. Such a declaration would prompt a national mobilization to prevent gun violence and greatly reduce the number of victims of gun violence.

3. Embracing a public health approach to gun violence would also necessitate more research on the causes and population-based impact and result in recommendations for addressing the crisis.

4. The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) recommendsCongress lift the ban that prevented the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) from initiating research on gun violence, and should authorize funding for such comprehensive studies.

5. Sensible gun laws must be implemented, especially those that restrict access to assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

6. The country must change the culture of hate that now proliferates in social media, radio and on cable television. The Orlando massacre was driven by hate just like the mass shooting at Emmanuel AME Church and the shooting of six Sikhs in Oak Creek, Wisconsin.

NASW offers its condolences to the family and friends of the victims and the survivors. We also empathize with the pain of members of the LGBTQ community, which has experienced yet another hate attack.  It is up to all Americans to stand up for an end to mass murders and all forms of gun violence. It is also up to all Americans to recognize that hate speech and intolerance are the precursors to hate crimes.

Social justice organizations must become proactive in advocating for sensible gun laws such as a ban on assault weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines, as well as strengthening background checks for gun purchasing. Organizations must also support Congress lifting the ban on CDC’s ability to conduct research on gun violence, and ensuring they have sufficient funds to carry out comprehensive research.

For more information on Gun Violence, please visit Doctors for America and the coalition to end the ban on CDC gun violence research. NASW is a member of this coalition. For more information on the nature of hate crimes please visit The Southern Poverty Law Center. And to learn more about NASW’s involvement with gun violence prevention contact NASW Social Justice and Human Rights Manager Mel Wilson at mwilson@naswdc.org.

10 comments

  1. Good statement, but please don’t call sexual orientation a ‘tendency’. Would you ever say that someone has straight ‘tendencies’? I doubt.

    • Thanks for your comment. We used the description of the shooterr from news accounts. If you have better terminology please send us your suggestions.

      Greg Wright, NASW Public Relations Manager

  2. Dottie Laettner

    How about holding a nationwide ralley? All campuses across the nation on a specific day. Most people are furious that congress won’t act. Let’s keep momentum going this time! Let me know. I’m very happy to help.
    What other organizations can join us. How about all the fitness gyms, corporations. Churches etc. etc.
    All together as one nation under God!!

  3. I am surprised there is little mentioned about mental illness in the statement posted by the NASW.
    I feel this is most important! I wonder why this is?

  4. The news reported that the shooter’s father was delusional that he was the President of Afghanistan. Also, the shooter had behavioral problems since grade school and was probably a SBH/Severely Behaviorally Handicapped student. As an adult, he stalked a woman, and he committed domestic violence against his wife.

    Mental Health also needs to be addressed. Ohio closed 8 of their 11 state mental hospitals. People who are mentally ill have to survive seeing a paraprofessional case manager once a month, or they don’t survive. A psychiatrist told me that many of her prior state mental hospital patients are missing from the case management and hospital inpatient rosters; she assumes they are dead.

  5. New alliances are growing… common cause is found between among activist groups in the midst of this. As the tears begin to abate and the fury begins to die down if only just a bit… lets remember not to waste a crisis –especially since this moment seems particularly potent.

  6. As a professional association that represents the largest group of mental health providers in the U.S.A., NASW should post information regarding ways for social workers to help the victims and survivors and their loved ones including but not limited to, CISD training, Trauma-Informed Care, community resources, grief counseling, resilience and other professional activities.

    Instead, NASW is acting as a PAC going after one tool that radical Islamic terrorists use to kill people. Knives, box cutters, pressure cookers and immolation have been utilized by the terrorists to kill as well. It’s not the tool, it’s the terrorists that use them. Thus, why isn’t NASW advocating for research as to how and why people are recruited to become jihadists?

    I remain in solidarity and love with my friends and colleagues affected by the horrible events in Orlando last week. We cried and grieved together at the NASW Florida Chapter Conference in Orlando last week. We shared our love for each other and respect for each other’s opinions and feelings.

  7. Jo-Ann Smith,MSSW

    I agree with Beth. Furthermore, I do not know anyone that hates LGBTQ people. It is their lifestyle and expectation that they deserve preferential treatment that is hated. It is more their self-hate-the rest of us accept them as fellow human beings.
    Jo, MSSW

    • Rachael Richter, MSW, LISW-S

      With all due respect Jo-Ann, I am not sure where to start with my reply to your comment. I will simply say that I do not believe that exercising my right to attend a club without being gunned down, maintain employment without being fired because of my orientation, marry whomever I choose (and I could go on) is asking for “preferential treatment.” I don’t hate myself and I certainly don’t feel acceptance as a “fellow human being” from you based on your statements.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>